Madagascar recently scaled up volunteer community health worker (CHV) programs in community‐based Integrated Management of Childhood Illness (c‐IMCI) and reproductive health and family planning (RH/FP) to provide health care to remote and underserved communities.
Methods: A cross‐sectional observational evaluation was conducted using a systematic sample of 149 CHVs trained in c‐IMCI and 100 CHVs trained in RH/FP services. CHVs were interviewed on demographics, recruitment, training, supervision, commodity supply, and other measures of program functionality. CHVs were tested on knowledge of the case management guidelines or reproductive health and injectable contraception, respectively. Trained experts observed the performance of c‐IMCI‐trained CHVs as they each evaluated five ill children under 5 years old and RH/FP‐trained CHVs as they completed five simulated female client encounters with uninstructed volunteers at a health facility. Each ill child was clinically re‐assessed by a trained gold standard evaluator and results were compared to determine if c‐IMCI CHVs correctly performed essential assessment, classification, and treatment tasks. A c‐IMCI CHV performance score (on a scale of zero to 100) was calculated based on the mean percentage of tasks performed correctly for each ill child. A key outcome, the proportion of recommended treatments that were prescribed correctly by c‐IMCI CHVs compared to the gold standard, was determined. RH/FP CHVs were observed by trained experts as they discussed and counseled female clients in family planning options. A RH/FP CHV performance score (zero to 100) was developed scoring the CHVs’ ability to obtain basic information about a clients’ contraception needs, determine eligibility for the selected family planning method in which clients showed an interest, and the quality of counseling provided for the chosen method. Multivariable linear regression models were used to identify factors associated with CHV performance.
Results: c‐IMCI CHVs evaluated a total of 745 ill children under 5 years old. Their mean overall performance score was 75.1% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 72.3, 77.8). Higher scores on the knowledge assessment, having more years of education, and more CHV responsibilities were associated with better performance; whereas distance of greater than 20 km from a health facility, 1–5 supervision visits in the previous 12 months, and children presenting with respiratory illness or diarrhea were associated with a lower performance score. When compared to a gold standard evaluator, c‐IMCI CHVs referred 68% of children with severe illness or other indications for immediate referral to a health facility, and chose the appropriate life‐saving treatment, when it was needed, 53% of the time for children presenting with a c‐IMCI treatable illness (uncomplicated diarrhea, pneumonia, or malaria). CHVs demonstrated good technical proficiency in performing and interpreting rapid diagnostics tests (RDTs) for malaria with 90% accuracy. However CHVs appropriately chose to use RDTs, when indicated, 55% of the time. RH/FP‐trained CHVs had a total of 500 clinical encounters with women to provide family planning counseling. RH/FP‐trained CHVs had a mean overall performance score of 73.9% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 70.3, 77.6). More education, more weekly volunteer hours, and receiving refresher training correlated with a higher performance score. For critical tasks, such as promoting informed choice, screening clients for pregnancy and potential medical contraindications to certain contraceptives, and providing instructions to ensure successful method use, RH/FP CHVs had a mean critical task performance score of 78.2% (95% CI: 75.5‐80.8%). Nevertheless, RH/CHVs did not always completely follow standard checklists to (1) rule out pregnancy (the complete checklist was used in only 69% of client encounters) or (2) assess contraindications for oral contraceptive use (all necessary questions asked during only 41% of encounters with women expressing interest in the oral contraceptive method).
For more than a decade, the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) Mission in Madagascar and other partners have invested in the development of a national CHV system to improve access to life-saving primary health care services for rural and remote populations. Presently, the USAID/Santénet2 Project (SN2) aims to increase access to and availability of community-based interventions in 800 communes concentrated in 16 regions of eastern and southern Madagascar. SN2 provides local capacity building, training, and supervision to mobilize over 12,000 CHVs to offer lifesaving health services, including family planning counseling and short-acting contraceptives and maternal, newborn, and child health, including community case management for uncomplicated malaria, pneumonia, and diarrheal disease. In general, two CHVs have been elected by their communities from each of the 5,758 targeted villages located more than five kilometers from the nearest health center. MAHEFA, Santénet2’s sister project, is scaling up support for integrated community-based activities through an additional 3,500 CHVs in underserved western and northern Madagascar.
USAID/Madagascar asked the USAID Health Care Improvement Project (HCI) and the Global Health Technical Assistance (GH Tech) Project, with technical assistance from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), to conduct qualitative and cross-sectional studies, respectively, of CHV program functionality and performance. The purpose of this report is to synthesize the findings from the two assessments. Complete findings are available in the respective assessment reports (Wiskow et al. 2013 and Agarwal et al. 2013).
Based on the synthesized findings from the two assessments on CHV program functionality, the following recommendations are presented:
This short report describes the work of the USAID Health Care Improvement Project (HCI) in Ehtiopia to apply a community health system strengthening approach to improve the competence and performance of health extension workers (HEWs), strengthen the linkage between the community and the health system, and improve the capacity of community groups to take ownership of health programs in their catchment areas and establish an effective community health system.
Community health workers (CHWs) are internationally recognized for helping to reduce morbidity and mortality. Since 1978, the World Health Organization (WHO) has been promoting CHWs to perform selected health care tasks at the community level (WHO, 1989). “CHW” generally refers to individuals who, with limited training and support, provide health care and health education to people who live in their communities. Community health workers/volunteers are often recruited, managed, or supported through CHW programs of support—defined in this report as an organizational system that includes structures and processes providing operational and technical support to CHVs.
The USAID-sponsored Community Health Worker (CHW) Regional Meeting held in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia from June 19 to 21, 2012, was attended by over 60 government and nongovernmental (NGO) representatives from six African countries (Ethiopia, Kenya, Mali, Rwanda, Uganda, and Zambia) as well as participants from international NGOs and organizations. The meeting was planned by Initiatives Inc. under the USAID Health Care Improvement Project (HCI) and designed to share new tools and strategies to strengthen the functionality of government and NGO CHW programs; facilitate dialogue about challenges and best practices among participating countries and identify and support evidence-based strategies for scale-up. This report details proceedings from the meeting.