For more than a decade, the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) Mission in Madagascar and other partners have invested in the development of a national CHV system to improve access to life-saving primary health care services for rural and remote populations. Presently, the USAID/Santénet2 Project (SN2) aims to increase access to and availability of community-based interventions in 800 communes concentrated in 16 regions of eastern and southern Madagascar. SN2 provides local capacity building, training, and supervision to mobilize over 12,000 CHVs to offer lifesaving health services, including family planning counseling and short-acting contraceptives and maternal, newborn, and child health, including community case management for uncomplicated malaria, pneumonia, and diarrheal disease. In general, two CHVs have been elected by their communities from each of the 5,758 targeted villages located more than five kilometers from the nearest health center. MAHEFA, Santénet2’s sister project, is scaling up support for integrated community-based activities through an additional 3,500 CHVs in underserved western and northern Madagascar.
USAID/Madagascar asked the USAID Health Care Improvement Project (HCI) and the Global Health Technical Assistance (GH Tech) Project, with technical assistance from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), to conduct qualitative and cross-sectional studies, respectively, of CHV program functionality and performance. The purpose of this report is to synthesize the findings from the two assessments. Complete findings are available in the respective assessment reports (Wiskow et al. 2013 and Agarwal et al. 2013).
Based on the synthesized findings from the two assessments on CHV program functionality, the following recommendations are presented:
The Health Care Improvement Project (HCI) is the global mechanism of the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) for technical leadership and assistance to improve health care delivery and health workforce capacity and performance in USAID-assisted countries. HCI is currently working with 20 countries to strengthen facility- and community-based health services, human resources management, and services for vulnerable children and families, improving health outcomes and contributing to the achievement of the Millennium Development Goals. This short report describes the FY13 activities for the project.
Several quality gaps have been documented across the continuum of maternal, newborn, and child health (MNCH) services. For antenatal care (ANC), despite the progress in increasing its coverage, quality gaps persist. Several studies show that ANC services often miss the opportunity to provide essential services such as counseling clients on danger signs of pregnancy, delivery plans, nutrition, and postpartum family planning. Similarly, services around childbirth are often provided with compromised quality. Common quality gaps include the inadequate or incorrect use of the partograph to prevent the complications of prolonged labor for the mother and the newborn, neglecting to apply active management of third stage of labor to prevent postpartum hemorrhage, poor quality of emergency obstetric care, and failure to promptly detect newborn asphyxia and apply immediate resuscitation.
Quality improvement (QI) offers a powerful a means to increase the effectiveness of MNCH programs in resource-limited countries. QI is based on the understanding that a system is designed to produce the results it produces; in order to obtain better results, the system must change. Hence, in applying QI, teams in health facilities or communities analyze the systems and processes of delivering services, test changes to obtain better results, and measure the effect of the tested changes on pre-determined indicators. Teamwork and shared learning between QI teams allow for rapid spread of best practices.
This paper discusses the role modern QI approaches can play in improving MNCH outcomes and describes specific applications of across the continuum of MNCH care, including ANC, essential obstetric and newborn care, infant and child care, and post-partum family planning. Drawing on examples from the work of the USAID Health Care Improvement Project (HCI) in Africa, Asia, and Latin America, the paper shows how quality gaps in the services addressing the antenatal, intra partum, postnatal, neonatal, and child periods can be closed through modern QI approaches.
This report describes the results of a four-country assessment, funded by the US Agency for International Development (USAID), of high-impact maternal and newborn childbirth practices in the Europe and Eurasia (E&E) region. Conducted between October 2010 and August 2011 in 42 maternities in Albania, Armenia, Georgia, and Russia, the assessment examined the quality of high-impact childbirth and early post-partum maternal-newborn practices in sampled facilities, including the status of cross-cutting health system functions and provider and client attitudes, knowledge, and self-reported practices. The study provides a multi-perspective look at the quality of maternal- newborn care currently provided and as perceived by clients, with an eye toward assessing areas of strength and areas needing improvement.
The assessment found evidence for solid coverage of many best practices in the sampled maternities. Measured results are undoubtedly in part attributable to high stakeholder investment in the region, including by USAID, and most importantly are reflected in the decreasing maternal and neonatal mortality rates. However, despite the narrowing of the maternal and newborn mortality gap between E&E countries and their richer neighbors, the persistently higher rates of maternal and newborn mortality in the region demonstrate a need to hold and expand the gains, with a focus on areas of demonstrated service delivery weakness for high-burden conditions. Moreover, the legacy of highly specialized and medicalized care even for routine, uncomplicated deliveries remains strong in the region yet represents a care model that is unlikely to be cost-effective over the long-term.